Mehmed The Conqueror

Share This Post

When we look back at history, certain names jump out as game-changers—leaders whose ambitions and achievements forever alter the course of nations. Mehmed II, famously called Mehmed the Conqueror, is one such figure. 

His story is not just about a single man taking the throne; it’s about the reshaping of a centuries-old empire, the pivotal fall of an ancient city, and a ruler who blended tradition with innovation in surprising ways.

To understand Mehmed’s impact, we first need to set the stage by exploring how the Ottoman Empire rose to prominence. After all, no leader operates in a vacuum. From its modest beginnings as a small Turkish beylik in Anatolia to its expansion across southeastern Europe, the Ottoman realm had already shown a spark of greatness. 

However, it was under Mehmed—an ambitious young sultan with a vision for both conquest and reform—that the Ottomans would burst onto the global scene, surpassing all expectations.

In this post, we’ll trace Mehmed’s journey step by step. We’ll look at how he grew up, how he gained power, what he did as sultan, and the dramatic events that marked his rule. 

We’ll also explore his family life, the immediate aftermath of his death, and the monumental legacy he left behind. By the end, you’ll have a clear picture of why Mehmed the Conqueror stands out as one of history’s most transformative leaders.

The Rise of the Ottoman Empire: A Quick Backdrop

Before diving into Mehmed’s story, let’s briefly look at the bigger picture of the Ottoman Empire’s rise

It all started in the late 13th century with a leader named Osman I, from whom the term “Ottoman” derives. Originally just another local ruler in Anatolia—modern-day Turkey—Osman carved out a principality that steadily expanded over the next century.

Geographic Advantage: Positioned between Europe and Asia, the Ottomans controlled key trade routes. This gave them early wealth and influence.

Military Innovations: They weren’t just foot soldiers with swords and bows; the Ottomans embraced gunpowder weaponry quite early, including cannons that would later become crucial to Mehmed’s grand campaigns.

Conquest and Diplomacy: Successive Ottoman rulers balanced the art of warfare with strategic alliances, marriages, and treaties. This combination of force and negotiation let them steadily take over territories from the weakened Byzantine Empire and other local powers.

By the early 15th century, the Ottomans had footholds in both Europe (in the Balkans) and Asia (Anatolia). Yet they hadn’t quite achieved the unstoppable momentum that people often associate with the empire. Internal conflicts and threats from various fronts kept them on their toes. 

Then came Sultan Murad II, who managed to bring some stability—and, importantly, became the father of the future Mehmed II.

Birth and Childhood: A Prince in the Making

Mehmed II was born on March 30, 1432, in Edirne, at that time the Ottoman capital. This was a vibrant city on the Thracian plain, strategically located near the border with Europe. 

His father, Sultan Murad II, had to juggle multiple fronts—sometimes fighting in the Balkans, sometimes dealing with rival Turkish beyliks in Anatolia.

From the moment of Mehmed’s birth, palace life shaped his world:

Education: Ottoman princes weren’t raised like typical children. They had tutors for religion, languages, history, and military strategy. Mehmed studied Arabic and Persian, as well as the fundamentals of Islamic law and theology. But he also learned about classical influences—Greek and Roman works—because the Ottomans, despite being a Muslim empire, frequently came into contact with Byzantine culture.

Court Intrigue: The Ottoman court could be a high-stakes environment, filled with advisors, viziers, and powerful officials. Mehmed grew up watching alliances form and dissolve, learning that trust was a rare commodity.

Short Stint as Ruler

When Mehmed was only around 12, his father briefly stepped aside abdicating the throne, making Mehmed the nominal sultan. 

Murad II didn’t simply leave young Mehmed alone. Seasoned statesmen and military leaders (like the powerful vizier Çandarlı Halil Pasha) were expected to help guide the boy-sultan. This “council oversight” structure was meant to keep the empire steady while Murad stepped away.

However, when hostilities flared up again, particularly with the Crusade of Varna, Murad was urged to return to the throne because officials felt that a 12-year-old lacked the authority or battlefield experience needed in such a crisis.

Although Mehmed’s first rule was fleeting, it taught him valuable lessons about leadership under pressure.

By his mid-teens, Mehmed had absorbed a world of knowledge—both academic and practical. He’d also developed a certain grit, shaped by the experience of seeing how quickly fortune could change in Ottoman politics.

Ascending the Throne: The Early Challenges

In 1451, when Sultan Murad II died, 19-year-old Mehmed took the throne for good. While he had a royal pedigree, many in the empire weren’t sure if he had the mettle to handle the job. Some saw him as inexperienced; others viewed him as dangerously ambitious.

Swiftly Addressing Potential Rivals

In the Ottoman tradition, it wasn’t unusual for the new sultan to neutralize (often by lethal means) any male relatives who could rally supporters and challenge his reign. 

Mehmed already understood something that many medieval rulers had learned the hard way: if he didn’t act decisively, civil war might erupt between him and any cousins or half-brothers who felt they had a better claim

It sounds unthinkable by modern standards—eliminating your own kin—but at the time, it was viewed as a grim necessity to keep the empire stable. 

The logic ran like this: a brief tragedy of eliminating a rival in the palace prevented the larger tragedy of a bloody civil war, which could devastate the populace for years.

Late at night, Mehmed would meet with his closest confidants and senior officials. He’d ask: “Who among my family could gain enough backing to threaten my crown?” Discussions would be hushed but urgent. They’d go through the family tree—half-brothers, uncles, cousins—and identify which ones had the popularity or the cunning to raise an army or stir public unrest.

Armed with that list, Mehmed would quietly send out orders, ensuring that loyal guards or personal agents confronted these relatives—often with lethal force. The speed and secrecy were vital: if word leaked, a rival might gather enough troops to fortify a provincial city or strike a deal with an opportunistic neighbor like Hungary or a local Turkish principality.

The starkest part of this story is that “removing” rivals often meant killing them. The Ottomans even had a term for it: fratricide—the practice by which newly crowned sultans secured the line of succession. 

While every detail of Mehmed’s actions isn’t spelled out in the chronicles (much of it was kept behind palace walls), historians generally agree that several relatives who could claim the throne disappeared shortly after Mehmed took power.

Contemporary accounts suggest these deaths were carried out quietly, often in the dead of night, with minimal ceremony. The goal wasn’t cruelty; it was swiftness. Mehmed wanted to prevent any widespread panic or civil strife that a high-profile trial or confrontation might trigger.

Timing mattered so these orders were carried out within a day or two of accession. The longer a potential claimant lived, the greater chance they had to form alliances with powerful viziers or even foreign states. By handling this immediately, Mehmed cut off dissent before it could grow legs.

Asserting Authority Over Key Officials

The Ottoman court was teeming with powerful viziers, military officers, and local governors, many of whom had formed alliances under Murad II. Mehmed needed their loyalty, or at least their compliance.

He reaffirmed the positions of influential statesmen (like the grand vizier, if he deemed them loyal) or replaced them with allies he trusted. This helped close any vacuum of power.

Leveraging the Support of the Janissaries

The Janissaries were the elite corps of soldiers deeply invested in the empire’s stability—and by extension, in supporting a sultan who would reward their service. By ensuring that they received proper pay and by respecting their privileged status, Mehmed secured their backing.

Once the army was on his side, it was far more difficult for any rival faction to contest his rule militarily.

Diplomatic Moves

On the external front, Mehmed negotiated or renewed peace treaties with neighboring states like Hungary. He needed breathing room to tackle the challenge he believed was the key to Ottoman destiny: capturing Constantinople.

The Byzantine Question

The Byzantine Empire (with its capital in Constantinople) had been on a downward slide for years, clinging to a fraction of its once-vast territories. Yet the city remained a major symbol for Eastern Christianity and a linchpin in trade routes. 

For centuries, it had seemed almost untouchable due to its formidable walls and strong defenses. But Mehmed felt the time was right to change that.

He built fortresses on the Bosphorus—most famously Rumeli Hisari—to choke off Constantinople from potential support via the sea. He also commissioned massive cannons, some from European specialists, because he knew that traditional siege warfare alone wouldn’t bring down those legendary walls. 

Though he was young, these systematic preparations showed the empire that Mehmed was playing for keeps.

Conquest of Constantinople in 1453

One of the defining moments in Mehmed’s life—and in world history—came in 1453, with the epic Siege of Constantinople.

This was no ordinary siege; it was the collision of an ancient empire and a rising power, with both faith and politics hanging in the balance.

Failed Sieges Before Mehmed

It’s tempting to think the Ottomans showed up at Constantinople’s gates in 1453, cannons blazing, and simply took the city in one fell swoop. But that day was a long time coming

In fact, the Byzantine capital had withstood numerous earlier Ottoman sieges—and each failed attempt taught the Ottomans valuable lessons.

Bayezid I’s Siege (1390s): Decades before Mehmed was even born, Sultan Bayezid I tried to isolate Constantinople, hoping to starve it into submission. For a while, it looked like it might work. But the Ottomans suddenly faced a bigger threat: Timur (Tamerlane)invaded Anatolia. Caught between a looming Mongol army and the incomplete siege, Bayezid had no choice but to redirect his forces. Constantinople survived.

Murad II’s Strategic Pressures: Mehmed’s father, Murad II, also toyed with capturing the city. Although he never staged a definitive, all-out siege like Bayezid or Mehmed, he did put military and economic pressure on the Byzantines, seizing surrounding territories in the Balkans and Asia Minor. 

Every time the Ottomans chipped away at Byzantine control outside the city, they learned more about Constantinople’s network of defenders, alliances, and supply routes.

These earlier operations revealed just how formidable Constantinople was—its Theodosian Walls had repelled sieges for centuries, and the city’s defenders had a knack for forging last-minute alliances with Western European powers. 

The Ottomans realized that standard siege tactics—like building wooden towers or simply cutting off supplies—wouldn’t easily crack the fortress-like capital. They needed something fresh, something powerful enough to shatter the city’s legendary defenses.

Laying the Foundations for Success

By the time Mehmed II took power, he had the benefit of all these past lessons. The city still looked unassailable, but Mehmed believed the Ottomans now had the tools—and the will—to finish what others had started.

Fortresses on the Bosphorus: Before launching a formal siege, Mehmed built or reinforced fortifications along the Bosphorus Strait, especially Rumeli Hisarı on the European side. These fortresses served two critical purposes:

Cut off Aid: By controlling the narrow waterway, the Ottomans could prevent any reinforcements (or food shipments) from reaching Constantinople by sea.

Military Staging Ground: Troops stationed at these forts could easily converge on the city from multiple directions once the real siege began.

Diplomatic Distractions: Mehmed renewed or crafted temporary peace deals with neighbors like Hungary. He knew he didn’t want a second front opening up while he was busy with Constantinople—so he made sure to keep other potential enemies at bay until the city fell.

The Innovations That Changed Everything

While fortresses and alliances were crucial, the real turning point came from the Ottoman embrace of new warfare technologies and cunning tactics.

1. Massive Cannons

Breaking the Walls: Perhaps the most famous innovation was the use of enormous artillery pieces. Some cannons were reportedly cast by European engineers (like the Hungarian master cannon-maker Urban) specifically for Mehmed. They were so large they had to be transported by dozens of oxen over specially reinforced roads.

Psychological Impact: Aside from physical destruction, the thunderous bombardment demoralized Constantinople’s defenders, who were used to seeing siege towers battered away by the city’s medieval walls. This was a new kind of threat—loud, terrifying, and capable of punching through the ancient stone.

2. Naval Maneuvers and the “Ship Overland” Trick

Golden Horn Blockade: The Byzantines famously protected the Golden Horn harbor with a heavy chain. Most thought it impossible to bypass. But Mehmed had other ideas.

Overland Route: In a stroke of brilliance (and a lot of brute force), Ottoman engineers and soldiers dragged ships across land to a point behind the chain. Suddenly, the Byzantines’ safe harbor was under direct threat. This maneuver is still talked about as one of the most audacious moments in medieval siege warfare.

3. Coordinated Assaults

Mixing it Up: Mehmed didn’t rely on just one method. While cannons hammered the walls day and night, the Ottoman infantry and janissaries tested weak spots. Skirmishers probed defenses to keep the Byzantines constantly on alert.

Final Surge: After weeks of nonstop bombardment, the walls were sufficiently weakened. On May 29, 1453, a massive, well-coordinated Ottoman charge finally broke through. Emperor Constantine XI died in the ensuing chaos, and the city that had once boasted unbreachable defenses fell.

Taking Constantinople: A Symbolic Triumph

Although the physical capture of Constantinople was a turning point, its symbolic weight was even greater. For Christians in Europe, it marked the end of the Byzantine Empire, a direct heir of Rome that had lasted over a thousand years. 

For Muslims, it fulfilled a long-held dream—seizing the city that had seemed impenetrable for ages.

By controlling Constantinople, Mehmed didn’t just gain a city; he declared himself the new “Kayser-i Rum” (Caesar of Rome), tying the Ottoman lineage to the Roman heritage. This wasn’t an idle boast. It showed how Mehmed viewed the Ottomans not as mere conquerors but as legitimate successors to one of history’s greatest empires.

A New Imperial Capital: Almost immediately, Mehmed began rebuilding and repopulating the city—now called Konstantiniyye (though commonly referred to as Istanbul). He encouraged Greeks, Jews, Armenians, and others to settle or remain there, aiming to make it a multicultural hub that could rival any European capital.

Why This Matters

Many historians see the Fall of Constantinople as the event that bookends the Middle Ages and kicks off a new era. It reshaped trade routes (leading Europe to seek alternative paths to the East) and triggered a fresh wave of cultural exchange, as Byzantine scholars fled west, fueling the Renaissance. 

Meanwhile, the Ottomans emerged as an undeniable power, setting their sights on further expansions—a goal Mehmed the Conqueror wholeheartedly pursued until his final days.

The conquest of Constantinople secured his place in history as the man who ended a thousand-year-old empire and forged a new dawn in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Transforming the City

After the dust settled, Mehmed rode into Constantinople—soon to be known as Istanbul—and made the Hagia Sophia into a mosque. 

While some looting took place (a common practice among armies at the time), Mehmed quickly moved to protect much of the city’s infrastructure. He invited people of different backgrounds—Greek, Jewish, Armenian—to stay or return, aiming to rebuild a bustling metropolis that would serve as the empire’s new capital.

For the Christian world, the fall of Constantinople was a seismic event. It shattered the remnants of the Byzantine Empire and effectively ended the last direct link to the ancient Roman realm. 

For Mehmed, this conquest earned him the eternal moniker “the Conqueror” and set the Ottomans on a path to become a major force in Mediterranean politics. 

Legend has it he styled himself as a successor to the Caesars, blending Islamic rulership with Roman imperial heritage.

Other Military Campaigns

Expanding the Empire: Conquests in Europe and Beyond

While the 1453 siege often takes center stage in his story, Mehmed spent much of his reign on the march, shaping the boundaries of the Ottoman Empire through a series of expansions and strategic maneuvers.

Conquests and Consolidation in the Balkans

Serbia and Bosnia

Serbia: After the dust settled on Constantinople, Mehmed turned his gaze north. He captured Smederevo (the Serbian capital) in 1459, effectively absorbing what remained of the Serbian despotate into Ottoman lands.

Bosnia: Bosnia fell shortly after, with Ottoman forces capturing key strongholds. The region’s mountainous terrain posed challenges, but Mehmed’s well-organized army overcame local resistance. Over time, Sarajevo emerged as a significant Ottoman administrative and cultural center.

Albania and the Stubborn Resistance of Skanderbeg

Albanian leader Gjergj Kastrioti (Skanderbeg) had rebelled against Ottoman rule. From fortified mountain bases, Skanderbeg’s forces stymied multiple Ottoman offensives.

Although Mehmed scored a handful of victories and captured some Albanian strongholds, the fierce local resistance remained a thorn in the side of Ottoman ambitions. Only after Skanderbeg’s death in 1468 did Albania slowly come under tighter Ottoman control.

Expansion and Consolidation in Anatolia

By Mehmed’s time, the Ottoman grip on Anatolia (modern-day Turkey) was firm in some areas but loose in others. Various Turkish emirates (beyliks) still held pockets of land.

Karamanids in Central Anatolia

The Karamanid principality around Konya was known for rebelling whenever the Ottomans were distracted. Mehmed led campaigns to suppress these revolts and ultimately subdued the region, cementing Ottoman authority across central Anatolia.

Eastern Frontiers

While Anatolia’s western half was more urban and heavily integrated, the eastern edge was home to tribal confederations and smaller states. Mehmed generally extended Ottoman influence there through diplomacy and occasional forays, laying a foundation for later rulers to expand deeper into the Middle East.

Black Sea Domination

Mehmed recognized the Black Sea as a critical zone for trade and maritime power. Controlling its shores meant monitoring commerce routes and preventing enemies from landing behind Ottoman lines.

Trebizond (Trabzon)

A Byzantine Remnant: The Empire of Trebizond had been a Byzantine splinter state on the Black Sea coast. In 1461, Mehmed personally led a campaign to capture Trebizond, ending its century-long rule and bringing another strategic port under Ottoman control.

Genoese Colonies

Trade Outposts: Genoese merchants had established trading colonies like Caffa (in Crimea). Mehmed targeted these enclaves to ensure the Ottomans held a monopoly on lucrative Black Sea commerce. Over time, they fell under Ottoman sway or had to accept Ottoman suzerainty.

Otranto and the Push Toward Italy (1480)

Late in his reign, Mehmed’s ambitions stretched beyond the Balkans and Anatolia—to the heart of the Italian peninsula.

The Landing at Otranto

1480 Invasion: Ottoman forces seized the coastal city of Otranto, located in the heel of Italy’s “boot.” This bold move alarmed Italian states and the papacy, as it hinted at a broader Ottoman plan to penetrate mainland Europe.

Short-Lived Success: After Mehmed’s sudden death in 1481, the Ottomans struggled to hold Otranto. Reinforcements wavered, and local forces quickly recaptured the city. Though short, the campaign underscored just how far-reaching Mehmed’s ambitions were.

Legacy of These Other Campaigns

1. Shaping a Multinational Empire

• By pushing into new lands—Bosnia, Serbia, Trebizond—Mehmed carved out a vast empire of diverse faiths and ethnicities. He was just as much a strategist off the battlefield, often combining military victories with diplomatic maneuvers or encouraging local elites to accept Ottoman rule in return for certain autonomies.

2. Securing Key Trade Routes

• Controlling the Black Sea ports—and thereby the flow of goods like grain, wax, and slaves—proved lucrative. It also denied rivals (particularly Venice and Genoa) easy access to those markets, boosting the Ottoman economy and war chest.

3. Fostering Regional Stability

• Ironically, once subjugated, many of these territories experienced relative peace under centralized Ottoman governance, especially if they acquiesced to Mehmed’s rule. Commerce grew, and local elites often found it pragmatic to cooperate.

4. Setting the Stage for Future Sultans

• Mehmed’s successes in the Balkans and Anatolia laid a powerful foundation for later Ottoman rulers like Bayezid II and Suleiman the Magnificent. By the time Suleiman took the throne, the empire boasted firm control of southeastern Europe and Anatolia—impossible without Mehmed’s earlier conquests.

By weaving together military victories, diplomatic pacts, and economic strategies, Mehmed didn’t just conquer a legendary city—he rewrote the map from southeastern Europe to the Black Sea, setting the tone for the Ottoman Empire’s centuries-long status as a dominant Eurasian power.

Ruling an Expanding Empire: Reforms and Governance

Securing Constantinople was just one piece of Mehmed’s plan. He had bigger visions for the Ottoman state, which was now multi-ethnic, spanning from southeastern Europe into Anatolia and beyond.

Bureaucratic Overhaul

Centralizing Power: Mehmed believed that to prevent internal rifts, power needed to flow directly from the sultan. He reorganized the bureaucracy, ensuring that regional governors (beys) were loyal to him.

Law and Order: He introduced legal codifications, blending Islamic law with local customs. This helped stabilize newly conquered regions, reassuring local populations that they had a place within the Ottoman framework.

Cultural Patronage

Building Projects: In addition to reconstructing Constantinople, Mehmed sponsored numerous mosques, schools (madrasas), and public works throughout the empire. Topkapi Palace, for instance, became not just the sultan’s residence but the very symbol of Ottoman imperial authority.

Open-Minded Scholarship: Mehmed’s personal curiosity led him to welcome scholars, architects, and artists from different backgrounds—Greeks, Italians, Persians. Stories abound of him reading Greek classics or discussing theology with visiting scholars. This openness enriched Ottoman intellectual life.

Military Might

Maintaining a Standing Army: The Ottoman military was arguably the best organized in Europe at the time. Mehmed expanded the use of janissaries—an elite corps typically drawn from devshirme (a system of conscription from non-Muslim communities). With rigorous training and loyalty to the sultan, they formed the backbone of his army.

Navy Ambitions: Having realized the importance of naval power during the siege of Constantinople, Mehmed boosted the Ottoman fleet. Ports in the Black Sea and the Aegean became strategic hubs for trade and warships alike.

Through these reforms and expansions, Mehmed transformed what had been a patchwork empire into a more cohesive state. No longer was the Ottoman realm just a conqueror’s domain; it was a structured, organized, and culturally dynamic superpower-in-the-making.

The Sultan’s Family and Personal Life

Being a sultan meant living a life both luxurious and dangerous. Mehmed’s private sphere was deeply intertwined with matters of state.

Imperial Harem: Ottoman sultans had a harem where concubines (often from diverse backgrounds) bore the sultan’s children. This institution was more than just a living arrangement; it was a political tool—families of these women sometimes had influence, and their children could ascend to power.

Key Offspring: Mehmed fathered several sons, among them Bayezid II, who would succeed him. Ottoman succession laws weren’t strictly defined, which caused fierce rivalries among royal siblings. Mehmed himself had navigated these waters as a young prince, and now his own children would have to do the same.

Daily Rituals: While we often picture sultans in war or at grand ceremonies, Mehmed also had a passion for reading and learning. He famously collected books on various subjects, from poetry to geography.

Life in the Ottoman palace could be lavish—filled with feasts, music, and elaborate ceremonies. But it was also governed by strict hierarchies and constant vigilance. Mehmed likely spent as much time strategizing about potential internal threats as he did planning new campaigns.

Mehmed’s Death and Aftermath

By his late 40s, Mehmed had ruled for nearly three decades, undertaken countless campaigns, and restructured the empire significantly. The strain of war, governance, and possibly the usual medieval ailments began to wear him down.

Mehmed II died on May 3, 1481. He’d been preparing for yet another campaign—some said it might be a renewed push into Italy, others speculated about targets in the East. 

But illness struck him hard near Gebze, just outside Istanbul. When the sultan passed, members of his inner circle rushed to contain the news. They knew from experience that an empire as vast as the Ottomans’ could be thrown into chaos the second a sultan was confirmed dead.

On one hand, loyal courtiers were grief-stricken. Mehmed had led them to greatness and reformed everything from the military to the bureaucracy. 

On the other hand, pragmatic officials realized the empire’s future depended on swift succession. Any delay, and foreign rivals or rebellious governors might seize the chance to break free.

Two Brothers, One Throne

The question looming over everyone’s mind was: Which prince would step forward—Bayezid or Cem?

Bayezid: Often seen as a calmer figure, he was already governing Amasya, an important provincial seat. Well-liked by many in the military and administrative circles, Bayezid stood out as a stable choice.

Cem (also spelled “Djem” or “Gem”): Younger, more adventurous, and not short on self-confidence. Cem had supporters, too—some in high places who believed he could bring a new spark to the empire.

The Courtiers’ Dilemma

In the frantic first hours after Mehmed’s death, top officials scrambled to send word to both princes. The Ottomans had no rigid rule, like primogeniture, so it was up to the princes themselves—and their allies—to race to the capital and claim the throne. 

Meanwhile, the Janissaries (elite soldiers) and leading viziers tried to keep Istanbul calm, anxious to avoid violence in the streets.

The Runners and Riders

Because Bayezid was geographically closer (and had better lines of communication), he received the news first—or at least had an easier path to respond. 

Couriers galloped through the countryside, spurred by the knowledge that whichever prince reached Istanbul with a display of power would likely be proclaimed sultan.

Letters flew, some urging Bayezid to hurry. Others quietly warned him about the possibility that Cem might arrive first and seize the day.

The Janissaries, crucial to any sultan’s authority, leaned towards Bayezid, partly because they believed he would maintain Mehmed’s reforms—and partly because he promised them timely pay.

Cem’s Gamble

Prince Cem, on the other hand, was further away and had to marshal his own forces. Some of his backers advised him to head straight for Istanbul. Others cautioned him to build a strong coalition first. 

Cem decided on a more deliberate approach: he sought alliances with local governors and potentially sympathetic European powers that might want to weaken the Ottomans by supporting a rival claimant. 

However, this move took precious time—time Bayezid used to push full steam ahead to the capital.

As Cem lingered, rumors circulated that Hungarian or Papal states might sponsor him. To them, a divided Ottoman Empire sounded ideal. 

But those negotiations were slow and complex, and Cem needed immediate momentum.

Bayezid’s Arrival and Coronation

While Cem weighed his options, Bayezid made a beeline for Istanbul. He was greeted by key palace officials who declared their allegiance. 

The Janissaries, as expected, offered him their loyalty in return for a certain bonus (an age-old tradition that new sultans paid troops to secure goodwill).

Bayezid took a measured approach. He presented himself not as a radical break from Mehmed but as a steady continuation of Ottoman greatness.

Ordinary people in Istanbul, many of whom had grown used to Mehmed’s strong leadership, were eager for continuity. Bayezid’s relatively peaceful arrival was a relief—nobody wanted a destructive civil war to rock their city.

Within weeks, Bayezid was officially recognized as Sultan Bayezid II. But a threat still loomed: Prince Cem.

Cem’s Revolt and Exile

Not one to concede without a fight, Cem rallied supporters. He attempted to march on Ottoman territory, but Bayezid’s forces met him in battle, and Cem’s uprising didn’t gain the widespread traction he hoped for. 

Realizing he was outmatched at home, Cem fled abroad—first to the Knights of St. John in Rhodes, then navigating the complexities of European courts.

A Rival in Exile: While Cem remained alive, he was a constant worry for Bayezid. Foreign rulers could wave Cem like a chess piece, threatening to unleash him back onto Ottoman soil if Bayezid didn’t play along in diplomatic negotiations.

Final Resolution: Eventually, Cem’s prolonged exile sapped his ambitions. By the time he died in 1495, he was more a captive pawn in European politics than a realistic contender for the throne.

The Aftermath: A More Stabilized Empire

Once Cem faded from the picture, Bayezid II settled firmly into the sultanate. He devoted much of his reign to consolidating power, further reforming the state, and patronizing the arts—focusing more on diplomacy than on wide-scale conquests. 

The smooth transfer of power, at least by Ottoman standards, speaks volumes about Mehmed’s administrative legacy. He’d built a machine capable of continuing without him, provided the new leader arrived with a firm, recognized claim and the backing of the all-important army.

The Bayezid-Cem episode proved once again that clear succession rules were absent in the Ottoman framework. Future sultans would take note, often resorting to swift (and sometimes brutal) measures upon their accession to prevent rival claims.

Within months of Mehmed’s death, the empire was in the hands of his son, continuing the legacy of a strong, cohesive Ottoman state that would dominate the region for generations.

Administrative Legacy

His centralization reforms endured, meaning that even as heirs squabbled, the system of governance and taxation kept functioning.

Military Machine

The standing army and navy didn’t vanish overnight; they remained a powerful force, ready to defend or expand Ottoman interests.

Cultural Identity

The city of Istanbul had been revitalized under Mehmed. People from all over the empire—and beyond—called it home, making it a cosmopolitan hub. Future sultans would add their own layers to the city’s architecture, but Mehmed’s initial imprint would remain visible for centuries.

While internal power struggles could disrupt the empire temporarily, the structures Mehmed put in place provided a foundation for later sultans—such as Suleiman the Magnificent—to push the Ottoman state even further across three continents.

Legacy: Why Mehmed the Conqueror Still Matters

More than five centuries after Mehmed’s death, his name still commands respect among historians and enthusiasts of world history. Why?

1. The Fall of Constantinople: This monumental event reshaped the geopolitics of Europe and Asia. It also boosted the Renaissance in Western Europe, as Greek scholars fled west with ancient texts.

2. Symbol of Ambition: Mehmed exemplifies the kind of ruler who marries deep cultural curiosity with relentless military drive. He saw himself as a successor not just to Muslim sultans but also to the Roman emperors, bridging cultural and religious divides in his self-identity.

3. Architect of a Capital: By re-centering the empire in Istanbul, Mehmed laid the groundwork for a city that would rival any in Europe, culturally and economically. Istanbul remains Turkey’s cultural heart—largely due to the transformations begun under Mehmed.

4. Patron of the Arts and Knowledge: While known as a conqueror, Mehmed also invested in education, architecture, and scholarship. This duality—warrior and patron—sparked an Ottoman golden age that later sultans would continue.

5. Impact on Successors: Rulers after Mehmed inherited a more solid state apparatus and a larger territory. The achievements of subsequent sultans were, in many ways, built on Mehmed’s conquests and administrative reforms.

To this day, travelers to Istanbul can see traces of Mehmed’s era—from the mighty fortresses along the Bosphorus to the contours of the city’s historic peninsula. 

The blend of Byzantine and Ottoman heritage in the architecture and layout of old Istanbul owes much to his vision. And academically, the study of Mehmed’s life provides insight into how an empire can transform under a single, driven leader.

Conclusion: The Man Who Redefined Empire

Mehmed the Conqueror wasn’t just a sultan who seized a legendary city. He was a statesman who reorganized an entire empire, a culture-broker who welcomed scholars and ideas from different realms, and a strategist who recognized the power of technology (like heavy artillery) to overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles.

When he died in 1481, Mehmed left behind a stronger, more unified, and expansive Ottoman Empire. His legacy is seen in the many layers of Istanbul’s skyline, in the administrative systems that endured for centuries, and in the cultural tapestry that blended East and West. 

While subsequent sultans made their own marks, none could erase the central role Mehmed played in setting the course for one of history’s most influential empires.

In the centuries since, historians have debated the nuances of his rule—was he too ruthless? Could he have gone further? Was his vision fully realized? But there’s no debate that he forever changed the map and the mindset of his realm. 

The name “Fatih” (Conqueror) wasn’t just a flourish; it was an earned title that captures the essence of a ruler whose decisions continue to echo through modern times.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join us as we travel back in time.

More To Explore

Heroes

Attila The Hun

Attila the Hun, aka the Scourge of God was a ferocious nomad from the Eurasian steppes that became the terror of the world’s mightiest empire, shaping events that herald the dawn of the Middle Ages.

Heroes

Mehmed The Conqueror

The story of Mehmed II, famously called Mehmed the Conqueror, is not just about taking the throne; it’s about the reshaping of a centuries-old empire, the pivotal fall of an ancient city, and blending tradition with innovation in a way so that the Ottoman state could dominate the region for generations.

Stay with us!

Subscribe and get the latest news.

Your information is safe with us. Privacy Policy